tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36795816.post7740305432662431502..comments2023-11-28T10:39:15.517+01:00Comments on (an)sichten: Sending Messages faster than with Speed of Light using Quantum Entaglement?Alexander Schattenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02580484314696408186noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36795816.post-81295062325997179752011-06-21T22:43:28.300+02:002011-06-21T22:43:28.300+02:00I'm no physicist either but I think the reason...I'm no physicist either but I think the reason why this won't work is that the only thing you can derive from a measurement is the outcome of the measurement on the other side but not if there is or was a measurement on the other side at allTobias Hnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36795816.post-70234334957501775562011-06-21T22:04:42.708+02:002011-06-21T22:04:42.708+02:00the reason why this won't work is that the onl...the reason why this won't work is that the only thing that can be derived after a measurement is the outcome of the measurement on the other side but not if there was a measurement on the other side at allTobias Hnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36795816.post-83706428089124366582011-06-21T15:21:19.565+02:002011-06-21T15:21:19.565+02:00I have no idea if this would work but at least in ...I have no idea if this would work but at least in your algorithm there is a potential improvement. As you just have to transmit two states and you don't know if the next state is correct, wouldn't it be enough to use the time for the next transmission as a correcting factor?<br /><br />In your Example:<br /><br />current value | duration after measure | value recorded<br /> 0: 2s corrected to 1<br /> 1: 2s corrected to 0<br /> 1: 1s --> 1<br /> 0: 1s --> 0<br /> 0: 2s corrected to 1<br /> 0: 3s --> 0 <br /> 1: eofGerd Saurerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12088909748713892995noreply@blogger.com